From George H. W. Bush to Donald Trump. Presidents' pledges on trade and what they accomplished (1989-2021)

Authors

Abstract

This article evaluates the fulfillment of electoral pledges on trade policy by US presidents in the period from 1989 to 2021 with the aim of identifying patterns of continuity and change in the agenda of the parties and the country. The identification of promises was made based on the analysis of the campaign manifestos of the parties of the presidents elected in the period. The criterion established to evaluate the fulfillment of the pledges was the implementation of an action. There are similar degrees of compliance between Democrats and Republicans, whose agendas (i) are similar in terms of free trade agreements and protectionist measures and (ii) diverge in relation to the adherence of labor rights and environmental protection commitments in these agreements. Original, it contributes to the debate on the quality of democratic representation by measuring the degree of responsiveness of political parties in a policy of special interest to American workers. At the same time, it shows how bipartisan continuity and convergence were fundamental in guiding US trade policy.

Keywords:

USA, Political parties, Trade policy, President, Pledge

Author Biographies

Flávio Contrera, Universidade Estadual Paulista

Pesquisador em Pós-Doutorado no Instituto de Políticas Públicas e Relações Internacionais na Universidade Estadual Paulista (IPPRI-UNESP).

Karina Lilia Pasquariello Mariano, Universidade Estadual Paulista

Professora Doutora do Departamento de Ciências Sociais na Faculdade de Ciências e Letras da Universidade Estadual Paulista (FCL-UNESP).

Roberto Goulart Menezes, Universidade de Brasília

Professor Doutor do Instituto de Relações Internacionais na Universidade de Brasília (IREL-UnB).

References

Alvaredo, F. et al. (2020). Relatório da desigualdade mundial 2018. Rio de Janeiro: Intrínseca.

Bara, J. (2005). A Question of Trust: Implementing Party Manifestos. Parliamentary Affairs, 58(3): 585-599. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsi053

Birch, A. (1964). Representative and Responsible Government: An Essay on the British Constitution. London: George Allen & Unwin.

Brenner, R. (2003). O Boom e a bolha. Rio de Janeiro: Record.

Calvo, E. & Murillo, M. V. (2013). When Parties Meet Voters: Assessing Political Linkages Through Partisan Networks and Distributive Expectations in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Political Studies, 46(7), 851-882. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463882

Carreirão, Y. (2019). O debate metodológico nos estudos de congruência política: uma revisão da literatura internacional. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 27(69): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987319276902

Costello, R. & Thomson, R. (2008). Election Pledges and their Enactment in Coalition Governments: A Comparative Analysis of Ireland. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18(3): 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280802227652

Congressional Research Service. (2021). Dispute Settlement in the WTO and U.S. Trade Agreements. CRS Reports, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF10645/8

Cruz, S. (2005). Estado e mercado: a OMC e a constituição (incerta) de uma ordem econômica global. RBCS, 20(57): 83-108. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69092005000100006

Cruz, S. (2007). Trajetórias do capitalismo neoliberal. São Paulo: Unesp.

Cruz, S. (2017). Estados e Mercados. Os Estados Unidos no sistema multilateral de comércio. São Paulo: Unesp.

Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

Dutra, W. (2015). Guerra ao Terror: A (des)construção de uma resposta estratégica de combate ao terrorismo. Revista Estudos Políticos, 6(1): 159-181. https://doi.org/10.22409/rep.v6i11.39784

Economic Policy Institute. (2013, 9 de dezembro). NAFTA’s Impact on U.S. Workers. Blog do Economic Policy Institute, https://www.epi.org/blog/naftas-impact-workers/.

Fiori, J. (2007). A Geopolítica do capitalismo global. São Paulo: Boitempo.

Fiori, J. (2005). Sobre o poder global. Novos Estudos Cebrap, 73: 61-72.

Gilpin, R. (2004). O Desafio do capitalismo global. Rio de Janeiro: Record.

Hofferbert, R. & Budge, I. (1992). The party mandate and the Westminster model: election programmes and government spending in Britain 1945-85. British Journal of Political Science, 22(2): 151-182. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400006323

Hellwig, T. (2011). Economic Globalization and Mass Politics Ten Country Study Data Set. October 20 version. Available at <https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:1902.1/16898>.

Hellwig, T. & Samuels, D. (2007). Voting in Open Economies: The Electoral Consequences of Globalization. Comparative Political Studies, 40(3): 283–306.

Howlett, M. & Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying Public Policy. Canadá: Oxford University Press.

Jensen, J.B., Quinn, D.P., Weymouth, S. (2017). Winners and Losers in International Trade: The Effects on US Presidential Voting. International Organization, 71(3) 423–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818317000194

Jones, J. (2022, March 10). U.S. Views of Foreign Trade Nearly Back to Pre-Trump Levels. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/390614/views-foreign-trade-nearly-back-pre-trump-levels.aspx

Keohane, R. (1984). After hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Klingemann, H.-D., Hofferbert, R. & Budge, I. (1994). Parties, policies and democracy. New York: Westview Press.

Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. & Budge, I. (2006). Mapping policy preferences II: estimates for parties, electors, and governments in Central and Eastern Europe. European Union and OECD 1990- 2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lameiras, L. & Menezes, R.G. (2019). Política Comercial dos EUA: trajetória e protagonismo nas iniciativas de liberalização comercial ao longo dos governos Obama (2009-2017). Carta Internacional, 14(3): 142-167. https://doi.org/10.21530/ci.v14n3.2019.901

Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking representation. The American Political Science Review, 97(4): 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000856

Mansbridge, J. (2020). The evolution of political representation in liberal democracies: concepts and practices. In R. Rohrschneider & J. Thomassen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political representation in liberal democracies (pp. 17-54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mcdonald, M. & Budge, I. (2005). Elections, parties, democracy: conferring the median mandate. Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press.

Mendonça, F. et al. (2019). “American first but not alone”: uma (nem tão) nova política comercial dos Estados Unidos com Donald Trump. In S. V. Cruz & N. Bojikian (Eds.), Trump: primeiro tempo (pp. 119-151). São Paulo: Unesp.

Milanovic, B. (2020). Capitalismo sem rivais. São Paulo: Todavia.

Müller, S. (2019). Accountability, and the Democratic Mandate: analyzing pledges, party competition, media coverage, and public opinion [Tese de doutorado, University of Dublin, Irlanda].

Naurin, E., Royed, T. & Thomson, R. (2019). Party Mandates and Democracy: making, breaking, and keeping election pledges in twelve countries. New Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Owen, E. & Quinn, D.P. (2016). Does Economic Globalization Influence the US Policy Mood? A Study of US Public Sentiment, 1956–2009. British Journal of Political Science, 46(1):95–125.

Pétry, F. & Collette, B. (2009). Measuring How Political Parties Keep Their Promises: A Positive Perspective from Political Science. Em L. Imbeau (Ed.), Studies in Public Choice (pp. 65-80). New York: Springer.

Pitkin, H. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Powell Jr., G. B. (2000). Elections as instruments of democracy: majoritarian and proportional visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Powell Jr., G. B. (2009). “The ideological congruence controversy: the impact of alternative measures, data, and time periods on the effects of election rules”. Comparative Political Studies, 42(12): 1475-1497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332147

Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. & Manin, B. (1999). Democracy, accountability, and representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Read, R. (2005). Trade dispute settlement mechanisms: the WTO dispute settlement understanding in the wake of the GATT. Working Papers 564824, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.

Royed, T. (1996). Testing the Mandate Model in Britain and the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher Eras. British Journal of Political Science, 26(1): 45-80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400007419

Seib, G.F. (2015, 28 de abril). Para Obama, acordo comercial com Ásia pode reduzir influência da China. The Wall Street Journal, reproduzido no Valor Econômico, São Paulo.

Souza, A., Nasser, R. & Moraes, R. (2014). Do 11 de setembro de 2001 à guerra ao terror: reflexões sobre o terrorismo no século XXI. Brasília: IPEA.

Stiglitz, J. (2003). Os exuberantes anos 90. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.

Stoler, A. (2004). The WTO dispute settlement process: did the negotiators get what they wanted?. World Trade Review, 3(1): 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474560400165X

Thomson, R. (2011). Citizens’ evaluations of the fulfillment of election pledges: evidence from Ireland. The Journal of Politics, 73(1): 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000952

Vigevani, T., Mendonça, F. & Lima, T. (2018). Poder e Comércio: a política comercial dos Estado Unidos. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.